Human-in-the-loop Machine Translation With Large Language Model · The Large Language Model Bible Contribute to LLM-Bible

The Large Language Model Bible

Research on Large Language Models. Maintained by Sean Moran.

Contact Sean Moran about this survey or website. Made with Jekyll and Hyde.

Human-in-the-loop Machine Translation With Large Language Model

Yang Xinyi, Zhan Runzhe, Wong Derek F., Wu Junchao, Chao Lidia S.. Arxiv 2023

[Paper] [Code]    
Applications Attention Mechanism GPT Has Code In Context Learning Model Architecture Prompting RAG Tools

The large language model (LLM) has garnered significant attention due to its in-context learning mechanisms and emergent capabilities. The research community has conducted several pilot studies to apply LLMs to machine translation tasks and evaluate their performance from diverse perspectives. However, previous research has primarily focused on the LLM itself and has not explored human intervention in the inference process of LLM. The characteristics of LLM, such as in-context learning and prompt engineering, closely mirror human cognitive abilities in language tasks, offering an intuitive solution for human-in-the-loop generation. In this study, we propose a human-in-the-loop pipeline that guides LLMs to produce customized outputs with revision instructions. The pipeline initiates by prompting the LLM to produce a draft translation, followed by the utilization of automatic retrieval or human feedback as supervision signals to enhance the LLM’s translation through in-context learning. The human-machine interactions generated in this pipeline are also stored in an external database to expand the in-context retrieval database, enabling us to leverage human supervision in an offline setting. We evaluate the proposed pipeline using GPT-3.5-turbo API on five domain-specific benchmarks for German-English translation. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the pipeline in tailoring in-domain translations and improving translation performance compared to direct translation. Additionally, we discuss the results from the following perspectives: 1) the effectiveness of different in-context retrieval methods; 2) the construction of a retrieval database under low-resource scenarios; 3) the observed domains differences; 4) the quantitative analysis of linguistic statistics; and 5) the qualitative analysis of translation cases. The code and data are available at https://github.com/NLP2CT/HIL-MT/.

Similar Work