Pythonsaga: Redefining The Benchmark To Evaluate Code Generating Llms · The Large Language Model Bible Contribute to LLM-Bible

Pythonsaga: Redefining The Benchmark To Evaluate Code Generating Llms

Yadav Ankit, Beniwal Himanshu, Singh Mayank. Arxiv 2024

[Paper]    
Applications Ethics And Bias Prompting Security

Driven by the surge in code generation using large language models (LLMs), numerous benchmarks have emerged to evaluate these LLMs capabilities. We conducted a large-scale human evaluation of HumanEval and MBPP, two popular benchmarks for Python code generation, analyzing their diversity and difficulty. Our findings unveil a critical bias towards a limited set of programming concepts, neglecting most of the other concepts entirely. Furthermore, we uncover a worrying prevalence of easy tasks, potentially inflating model performance estimations. To address these limitations, we propose a novel benchmark, PythonSaga, featuring 185 hand-crafted prompts on a balanced representation of 38 programming concepts across diverse difficulty levels. The robustness of our benchmark is demonstrated by the poor performance of existing Code-LLMs.

Similar Work