Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing The Boundaries Of LLM Performance In Machine Translation · The Large Language Model Bible Contribute to LLM-Bible

Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing The Boundaries Of LLM Performance In Machine Translation

Xu Haoran, Sharaf Amr, Chen Yunmo, Tan Weiting, Shen Lingfeng, Van Durme Benjamin, Murray Kenton, Kim Young Jin. Arxiv 2024

[Paper]    
Applications Efficiency And Optimization Fine Tuning GPT Model Architecture Pretraining Methods Training Techniques

Moderate-sized large language models (LLMs) – those with 7B or 13B parameters – exhibit promising machine translation (MT) performance. However, even the top-performing 13B LLM-based translation models, like ALMA, does not match the performance of state-of-the-art conventional encoder-decoder translation models or larger-scale LLMs such as GPT-4. In this study, we bridge this performance gap. We first assess the shortcomings of supervised fine-tuning for LLMs in the MT task, emphasizing the quality issues present in the reference data, despite being human-generated. Then, in contrast to SFT which mimics reference translations, we introduce Contrastive Preference Optimization (CPO), a novel approach that trains models to avoid generating adequate but not perfect translations. Applying CPO to ALMA models with only 22K parallel sentences and 12M parameters yields significant improvements. The resulting model, called ALMA-R, can match or exceed the performance of the WMT competition winners and GPT-4 on WMT’21, WMT’22 and WMT’23 test datasets.

Similar Work