An Ecosage Assistant: Towards Building A Multimodal Plant Care Dialogue Assistant · The Large Language Model Bible Contribute to LLM-Bible

An Ecosage Assistant: Towards Building A Multimodal Plant Care Dialogue Assistant

Tomar Mohit, Tiwari Abhisek, Saha Tulika, Jha Prince, Saha Sriparna. Arxiv 2024

[Paper]    
Few Shot Fine Tuning In Context Learning Merging Multimodal Models Pretraining Methods Prompting Reinforcement Learning Survey Paper Tools Training Techniques

In recent times, there has been an increasing awareness about imminent environmental challenges, resulting in people showing a stronger dedication to taking care of the environment and nurturing green life. The current $19.6 billion indoor gardening industry, reflective of this growing sentiment, not only signifies a monetary value but also speaks of a profound human desire to reconnect with the natural world. However, several recent surveys cast a revealing light on the fate of plants within our care, with more than half succumbing primarily due to the silent menace of improper care. Thus, the need for accessible expertise capable of assisting and guiding individuals through the intricacies of plant care has become paramount more than ever. In this work, we make the very first attempt at building a plant care assistant, which aims to assist people with plant(-ing) concerns through conversations. We propose a plant care conversational dataset named Plantational, which contains around 1K dialogues between users and plant care experts. Our end-to-end proposed approach is two-fold : (i) We first benchmark the dataset with the help of various large language models (LLMs) and visual language model (VLM) by studying the impact of instruction tuning (zero-shot and few-shot prompting) and fine-tuning techniques on this task; (ii) finally, we build EcoSage, a multi-modal plant care assisting dialogue generation framework, incorporating an adapter-based modality infusion using a gated mechanism. We performed an extensive examination (both automated and manual evaluation) of the performance exhibited by various LLMs and VLM in the generation of the domain-specific dialogue responses to underscore the respective strengths and weaknesses of these diverse models.

Similar Work